吃瓜大本营

Attorney Ashley Johnson reflects how Gloria Steinem shares the work of the ACLU and how it lit the way for her own future in advocacy.

NEW YORK 鈥� Today, the American Civil Liberties Union鈥檚 Women鈥檚 Rights Project (WRP), the National Women鈥檚 Law Center (NWLC), and the Service Women鈥檚 Action Network (SWAN) filed a request under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) seeking records from the Department of Defense (DoD) regarding its decision to undertake formal review of the 鈥渆ffectiveness鈥� of women in ground combat roles. The request comes as DoD and Secretary Pete Hegseth have provided no meaningful explanation for why the review was ordered, what it will examine, or what its findings could mean for women鈥檚 continued ability to serve in ground combat roles. In December 2025, DoD launched a six-month review of women鈥檚 integration into ground combat units, a decade after lifting the remaining restrictions for women to compete for those roles, in which roughly 5,000 women have served. DoD directed the Army and Marine Corps to provide data on the 鈥渙perational effectiveness鈥� of those units, including internal studies about women鈥檚 integration, to the Institute for Defense Analyses (IDA), a nonprofit organization. DoD did not announce the formal review, which became public only after it was reported by a news outlet. In April 2026, DoD reassigned the review to Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (JHU/APL) and extended the study鈥檚 duration to one year. 鈥淒uring his tenure, Secretary Hegseth has repeatedly questioned women鈥檚 ability to serve in ground combat, including by misleadingly claiming that occupational standards have been lowered to accommodate women. Such standards have been gender-neutral, by statute, for over 30 years,鈥� said Gillian Thomas, senior counsel, ACLU鈥檚 Women鈥檚 Rights Project. 鈥淭his formal review raises serious concerns that the Department of Defense is laying the groundwork to once again restrict qualified women from serving in combat. The public has a right to know why DoD ordered the review, its intended scope, and whether women鈥檚 exclusion from combat jobs is on the table as a potential outcome.鈥� 鈥淓xcluding qualified women from ground combat would make our military weaker, not stronger,鈥� said Elisa Cardnell, chief executive officer, SWAN. 鈥淲omen have always served with distinction on the front lines. Since formally being integrated into combat jobs, they have excelled in some of the military鈥檚 most demanding roles, brought critical operational experience and capabilities to missions around the world, and strengthened recruitment and retention. Every qualified servicemember should have the opportunity to earn their place and serve.鈥� 鈥淚nvestigating women鈥檚 effectiveness in the military is baseless, sexist, and offensive,鈥� said Lauren Khouri, senior director of workplace justice at NWLC. 鈥淗egseth has been explicit about his intentions to push women out of the military and today we鈥檙e filing to find out the extent and intention of this review. This is an attack on our servicemembers and the public deserves transparency.鈥� Women have always been on the frontlines of our nation鈥檚 defense and have served in every major U.S. conflict. For decades, however, restrictions barred women from thousands of combat positions. Those restrictions were gradually dismantled as women proved themselves in increasingly demanding assignments, including during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, where women were killed, wounded, and decorated for valor. In 2016, all remaining ground combat roles were open to women following a lawsuit by WRP on behalf of SWAN and four servicewomen challenging the Pentagon鈥檚 policy barring women from serving in those positions. Today, this progress is at risk following a series of actions by Secretary Hegseth that have raised concerns about women鈥檚 ability to serve in the military on equal terms. In addition to questioning women鈥檚 ability to serve in ground combat positions, Secretary Hegseth has repeatedly denigrated women servicemembers and veterans and taken unprecedented action to fire women leaders 鈥� along with Black officers 鈥� and purge them from promotion lists. He has also initiated changes to physical eligibility criteria for combat jobs across the military branches, based on an asserted belief that women have been held to lower fitness standards. These actions raise concerns that the formal review serves as a prelude to restrict women鈥檚 continued service in ground combat roles. Earlier this year the top enlisted leaders of each of the military branches testified before the Senate Armed Services Committee that women鈥檚 integration into combat occupations has not compromised performance standards or operational readiness. Even under questioning from congressional leaders, Secretary Hegseth has not offered any evidence calling women鈥檚 combat 鈥渆ffectiveness鈥� into question, let alone supporting the need for further study. The FOIA request seeks records related to the formal review assigned to the Institute for Defense Analyses and later reassigned to the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, including records describing the scope, purpose, methodology, and anticipated use of the review. It also seeks records related to an earlier DoD review of combat jobs鈥� occupational standards. A copy of the FOIA request is available here.

Veterans reflect on their military service, the requirements of ground combat occupations, and the decade-long integration of women into those roles.

One woman violently forced into assisting a murder seeks clemency in Michigan. Author and journalist Justine van der Leun calls for states to enact laws protecting criminalized survivors.